UNICEF decries the “obscenity” of debating hunger figures while children die. Yet those same agencies sat at the table as aid was delayed, stolen, and politicised.
In a Nutshell
On 24 August 2025, UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell called the international wrangling over Gaza hunger statistics “obscene.” She warned that while officials debated spreadsheets, 18,000 children had already died since October 2023 nearly 28 each day.
Her outrage was striking, but incomplete. UNICEF itself is embedded in the UN system that allowed convoys to stall, warehouses to be hijacked, and food to be diverted by Hamas. For years, billions in aid were poured into Gaza through UNRWA, an agency riddled with corruption and complicity. To call the debate “obscene” is right but the greater obscenity is a system that produces famine in one of the most aid-saturated territories on earth.
Catherine Russell (24 Aug 2025):
“It is obscene to debate statistics while children die.”
Source: Politico
The Background
UNICEF has long been the face of humanitarian concern for children. Its appeals and reports are designed to capture the conscience of the world. Yet the famine in Gaza exposes the contradictions at the heart of its role.
The IPC had already declared Gaza at famine levels. OCHA and WFP confirmed it. WHO reported widespread malnutrition. By the time Russell spoke, the evidence was overwhelming. But the declaration came late, after months of hesitation, delay, and denial. The children had already died.
The Reality on the Ground
The famine is not the product of uncertainty over figures. It is the product of paralysis and theft.
Convoys were held at border crossings. Negotiations with Hamas consumed weeks. Aid was politicised into bargaining chips. Meanwhile, UNRWA warehouses were raided, supplies diverted, and flour sold on the black market. UNICEF’s words are passionate, but passion cannot obscure that the system of which it is a part was complicit in the very obscenity it condemned.
The Mainstream Media View
BBC: “UNICEF urges calm amid disputed hunger numbers.”
The Guardian: “UNICEF calls for unity over Gaza famine response.”
CNN: “Conflicting data slow Gaza aid response.”
The headlines reveal the instinct: soften the scandal into a story of bureaucratic miscommunication. What is never asked is the essential question: why did the UN continue to funnel aid through structures it knew Hamas controlled?
The Forgotten Stories
The language of “obscenity” could apply in many places.
- In Sudan, seven million face famine conditions in Darfur. No declarations. No outrage.
- In Ethiopia’s Tigray region, the famine endures years after war ended. Deaths are quiet, statistics buried.
- In Yemen, tens of thousands of children starved long before Gaza. Where were the speeches then?
The selectivity is telling. Outrage is abundant where Israel can be blamed. Elsewhere, famine is relegated to footnotes.
BBC Headline (24 Aug 2025):
“UNICEF urges calm amid disputed numbers.”
Source: BBC News
The Merlow View
Numbers matter in humanitarian crises. They decide where aid goes, how much, and to whom. But history shows that the greatest famines were not born of poor statistics but of politics and intent. The Bengal famine of 1943, the Holodomor of the 1930s, Mao’s China in the 1950s none were caused by bad data. They were caused by choices.
In Gaza, the obsession with figures concealed the real obscenity: Hamas used aid as a tool of control, UNRWA looked away, and Western donors tolerated the arrangement. To call the debate “obscene” is to half-speak the truth.
The fantasy is that UNICEF’s blunt words will finally force reform that aid will bypass corrupt agencies, that children will no longer be hostages to political games. The rational view is that little will change. The declarations will continue. The media will echo them. And the next famine, like the last, will be explained away by statistics.
Statistics can clarify, but they can also conceal. The famine in Gaza is not a mystery of numbers—it is the outcome of corruption, delay, and cowardice. To see it clearly is to recognise that children did not die because the figures were wrong, but because the system was. The invitation is to notice the pattern, to question the theatre, and to wake from the comfort of numbers into the harder truth of responsibility.
Thanks for sharing this post, it’s really helpful for me.
Glad to be of service.