When Syrian Druze faced attack, it was Israel — not the UN, not the West — that warned Assad and struck his forces.
In a Nutshell
In mid-July 2025, violence broke out in Syria’s southern Druze city of Suwayda. Assad’s forces moved to suppress protests, killing dozens and preparing a military push against the minority community. It was Israel — not Washington, not Brussels, not Turtle Bay — that acted. The IDF struck Syrian forces advancing on the city, and Jerusalem delivered an unmistakable warning: if the Druze are harmed, Assad’s military will pay.
Sky News: “Assad promises to protect Druze after Israeli warning.”
Source: Sky NewsThe Times of Israel: “IDF
Sky News reported that Assad suddenly pivoted, declaring the protection of the Druze a “priority.” The Times of Israel noted the irony: a dictator who had spent years killing his own people suddenly became a patron of minority rights — but only after Israel made its threat clear.
The Main Course
The Druze have always lived on the knife’s edge of Middle Eastern politics. In Israel, they serve in the IDF, hold public office, and are integrated into society. In Syria, they are pawns: tolerated when silent, crushed when defiant. In Suwayda, protests erupted over economic collapse and regime corruption. Assad’s instinct, as always, was brutality. His tanks rolled. His troops prepared to impose order by blood.
It was Israel, uniquely, that intervened. The strike on Syrian forces near Suwayda was not just about defending a minority. It was about principle. Israel has always understood that the survival of minorities — whether Druze, Yazidis, or Christians — is a test of moral seriousness in a region dominated by sectarian cruelty.
The UN, meanwhile, held no session. Western governments issued no statements. The same capitals that call emergency meetings when Gaza is in the news remained silent as Druze civilians were slaughtered. It is the same pattern of selective morality: outrage for narratives that fit the script, indifference for minorities that do not.
The Merlow View
History’s lesson is stark: minorities rarely survive without protectors. The Armenians of 1915 had none. The Kurds of Iraq in the 1980s had none. The Yazidis of Sinjar in 2014 had none until Western bombs fell. The Druze of Syria now face the same test. And once again, it is Israel that shows moral clarity while the world averts its eyes.
The fantasy is that Assad’s sudden promises mean safety. The reality is that dictators promise only what buys them time. The only reason Suwayda still stands is because Israel intervened. This is not about altruism alone. It is about the recognition that a Middle East without its minorities becomes a darker, more dangerous place — and that Israel, as a nation of survivors, understands this instinctively.
Share this: