When the bombs fell in June, Iranians fled their capital in fear. It was not just a military crisis, but an indictment of a regime already crumbling from within.
In a Nutshell
On 12 June 2025, as Israeli warplanes struck Iranian military sites, Tehran witnessed something not seen since the Iran–Iraq War: an exodus. Motorways clogged as families packed cars, trains were overwhelmed, and flights out of the capital sold out in hours. The so-called “Tehran Exodus” was not organised evacuation. It was panic. Panic born of fear that the Islamic Republic could no longer protect its own capital.
It was a vivid image of fragility: the regime declaring victory while its citizens fled.
The Main Course
The spectacle of a capital city emptying underlines a deeper truth. Wars are not just measured in casualties or battle maps; they are measured in confidence. And when a regime cannot guarantee safety in its most guarded city, confidence evaporates.
Iran has long presented itself as a fortress state. Revolutionary Guards on every corner, a labyrinth of tunnels, endless parades of missiles. Yet in June, ordinary Iranians knew instinctively that these defences meant little. The regime’s obsession with exporting revolution—to Lebanon, Yemen, Syria—left its own people exposed. Billions spent arming Hezbollah did not provide bread, nor fuel, nor air defences against precision Israeli strikes.
The people’s flight was not only from bombs, but from the hollow promises of a government that has failed them for decades.
The Media Recommends
International coverage treated the story with a curious restraint.
-
BBC spoke blandly of “disruption” in Tehran.
-
Reuters described it as a “temporary displacement.”
-
The Guardian worried more about “regional escalation” than the human reality of Iranians voting with their feet.
Not one asked the obvious: if the Islamic Republic is secure, why were its citizens fleeing its capital like refugees?
The Merlow View
History remembers moments when citizens lose faith in their rulers. When Berliners sheltered from Allied bombs, they knew Hitler’s days were numbered. When Soviet citizens queued for bread in 1989, the regime’s collapse was already written. The Tehran Exodus belongs in this lineage: a regime outwardly strong, inwardly brittle, exposed by its own people’s fear.
The fantasy is that Tehran will recover its authority, that the regime can reassure its population with slogans and parades. The reality is that fear leaves a stain. Once people flee, they remember the instinct that drove them. They remember who failed to protect them.
The lesson is clear: this was not merely a military episode but a psychological rupture. The exodus revealed that Iran’s rulers can no longer claim legitimacy, only coercion. And legitimacy, once lost, does not return.
The invitation is simple: see the flight from Tehran not as a passing panic, but as a sign of fracture. A society that flees its capital is a society that no longer believes. To notice this is to glimpse the future — not of Iran the fortress, but of Iran the failing state.
Share this: